Compression Loss

2017

‘Compression Loss (Venus)’, 2017 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny
‘Compression Loss (Venus)’, 2017
Jesmonite, concrete plinth, 165 x 50 x 50 cm
‘Compression Loss (Venus)’, 2017 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny
‘Compression Loss (Venus)’, 2017
Jesmonite, concrete plinth, 165 x 50 x 50 cm
‘Compression Loss (Venus Reflection)’, 2020 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny
‘Compression Loss (Venus Reflection)’, 2020
Jesmonite, 15 x 32 x 28 cm
‘Compression Loss (Venus)’, 2017 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny
‘Compression Loss (Venus)’, 2017
Jesmonite, concrete plinth, 157.5 x 50 x 50 cm
‘Compression Loss (Venus)’, 2017 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny
‘Compression Loss (Venus)’, 2017
Jesmonite, concrete plinth, 165 x 50 x 50 cm
‘Compression Loss (Hebe Odd)’, 2017 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny
‘Compression Loss (Hebe Odd)’, 2017
Jesmonite, 50 x 42 x 42 cm
‘Compression Loss (Hebe Evan and Hebe Odd)’, 2017 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny
‘Compression Loss (Hebe Evan and Hebe Odd)’, 2017
Jesmonite, Installation view
‘Compression Loss (Vase)’, 2017 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny
‘Compression Loss (Vase)’, 2017
Ceramic, 5 x 40 x 40 cm
‘Compression Loss’, 2018 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny Freyer)
Laburnum Street, 2018

Laburnum Street, 2018

‘Compression Loss’, Installation View, OMR, 2017 | Troika (Conny Freyer, Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel)
‘Compression Loss (Fallen Venus)’, 2017
Jesmonite, 30 x 100 x 200 cm
‘Compression Loss’, Installation View, OMR, 2017

‘Compression Loss (Fallen Venus)’, 2017, Installation View, OMR, 2017

‘Compression Loss’, 2018 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny Freyer)
’Hebe (glitch)’, 2022
Jesmonite, 51.5 x 24 x 39 cm
‘Compression Loss’, OMR, 2018 | Troika (Eva Rucki, Sebastien Noel, Conny Freyer)
’Compression Loss’,
OMR, Nov 10, 2017 → Jan 20, 2018

’Compression Loss’, OMR, Mexico City,
Nov 10, 2017 → Jan 20, 2018

2018

Compression Loss. A process by which a digital file looses some computational information each time it is copied, as well as a method of rationalisation in which the whole is seemingly understood by its deconstruction into smaller, separate parts — a process which does not account for accumulative significance.

3D models provided by musea’s digitised collections and depicting mythological objects and figures associated with technological mastery, knowledge or wonderment are re-introduced into the physical world through traditional casting methods.

The objects – an ancient Ming vase; Thoth, the ur-god of magic; the Aztec deity Xipe, the god of polarity, Hebe, the goddess of eternal youth and Antonio Canova’s Venus – are reproduced in individual slices of normed thickness. They are then re-assembled by re-appropriating logically and mathematically derived sequences or according to prescribed variations such as doubling or compression. Each iteration then has an identity that cannot be confused with its original. Yet, intrinsically linked to their source, each iteration alludes to the coalescence of seemingly irreconcilable opposites: authenticity and artifice, model and copy, the virtual and the real, the logical application of science and the shifting nature of mythology and belief.

‘Compression Loss’, OMR, 2017